What’s Behind Recent Gold and Silver Volatility?

By: Henry Wildes  |  April 23, 2026

By Henry Wildes 

Gold and silver have long been viewed as safe-haven assets, retaining or even rising in value during times of economic uncertainty. Their prices are largely driven by the strength of the U.S. dollar and by real yields. Because these assets are priced in dollars, a stronger dollar makes them more expensive for foreign buyers, which can reduce demand and bring prices down. Adversely, a weaker dollar has the opposite effect, making gold and silver attractive at times when the strength of the dollar is in question. Meanwhile, when real yields, or interest rates adjusted for inflation, fall, whether due to rate cuts or rising inflation, investors earn less on interest-bearing assets like bonds. This lowers the opportunity cost, or what investors give up, of holding non-yielding assets, like gold or silver. Because of this, gold and silver are largely viewed as some of the most attractive alternatives when real yields decline.

In recent months, however, gold and silver have behaved less like static safe havens and more like traditional, volatile investments. Changing expectations around Federal Reserve policy, inflation, and real yields have made both metals more reactive, as markets anticipate the relative opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets.

In early 2024, inflation proved more persistent than expected, and the Federal Reserve ended the series of rate hikes that began in 2022. This combination of factors kept real yields low, making gold and silver more attractive because the opportunity cost of holding them was minimal. The Fed then began cutting rates in September 2024 and continued through the end of 2025. These moves reinforced the decline in real yields, resulting in a sharply accelerating growth rate in the value of gold and silver. This peaked on January 28, 2026, when gold traded above $5,500 an ounce, and silver reached $118 an ounce. 

This did not last for long. Prices for both gold and silver began to fall on January 29, and by February 1, gold was down nearly 20% from its peak, and silver dropped 35%. Kevin Warsh’s selection as the next Fed chairman was interpreted as a hawkish signal, and at the same time, the dollar strengthened slightly. Together, these factors dramatically increase the expected opportunity cost of gold and silver. 

The sharp run-up in gold and silver prices before the end of January left many investors heavily leveraged, making them especially vulnerable when rate expectations shifted. As prices began falling, driven by a perceived increase in opportunity cost, many investors were forced to sell to cover losses or protect themselves, and automatic sell orders kicked in, accelerating the drop.

Silver dropped significantly more than gold. It tends to move more than gold on the downside because it is influenced by both investor demand and industrial use. Gold is primarily a safe-haven asset with less industrial use, so when markets fall, some investors buy it, helping limit its decline. Silver is also used in industries like electronics, so when economic activity weakens, that demand drops quickly. Also, because the silver market is smaller than the gold market, economic changes have a larger impact on the price of silver.

Since the start of February, both metals have entered a more volatile phase. Prices have become highly responsive to incoming data, especially inflation reports and Federal Reserve communication. When data points toward cooling inflation or earlier rate cuts, expectations for lower real yields increase, and metals rally. When data suggests persistent inflation or continued policy restraint, real yields rise and metals fall. The dollar has also remained an important driver, with strength typically weighing on prices.

Investor positioning has added another layer to the volatility. Many continue to view gold as a long-term hedge against inflation, while an increasing number trade it tactically based on changes in real yields and rate expectations. This mix of long-term holders and short-term traders has led to sharper reactions around data releases, as positioning adjusts quickly to new information.

Looking ahead, the key drivers remain centered on inflation and real interest rates. If inflation continues to decline while the Federal Reserve maintains a restrictive stance, real yields will likely remain elevated. This would keep the opportunity cost of holding gold and silver relatively high, limiting upside. If inflation proves stickier or economic conditions weaken enough to force rate cuts, real yields could fall, reducing opportunity cost and creating a more supportive environment for metals.

The likely outcome is continued volatility. Gold and silver will remain highly sensitive to small changes in inflation data, Federal Reserve expectations, the dollar, and broader economic signals, with prices adjusting quickly as markets continuously reassess real yields and opportunity costs.

 

Photo Credit: Unsplash